The previous article followed Kim Goguen’s account of how an ordinary early life became a formal succession to Marduk’s old administrative role. This article sets the origin story aside and asks the harder question this series has applied to every other figure it has covered: whatever the authority actually is, what is it being used for? That is the litmus test this series opened with, and no figure examined so far sits closer to the present moment than this one — which makes it the hardest test case in the entire series to apply.
Hands and Feet
By her own account, Kim Goguen channels Source directly and astral projects into galactic and planetary council sessions rather than receiving information secondhand through an intermediary. She has held a Universal Council ambassador seat since 2016, authored a Restoration Plan approved by that council in September of 2019, and describes the prior World Council as removed by the end of 2020, with a new Earth Council forming in its place afterward.
What she has not done, on her own account, is claim personal ownership of the authority that comes with any of that. Her own recurring framing is blunt about the distinction: she describes herself as “hands and feet,” adding, in her own words, “I just work here.” That is a strikingly different self-description than this series has encountered from any prior administrator in either the service-to-self or service-to-others lineage — an explicit disclaimer of personal authority, offered by someone whose formal titles would support claiming a great deal of it.
“Hands and feet. I just work here.” Not a humble brag. A stated boundary.
That boundary was tested directly and specifically in October of 2025, when she is reported to have declined to transfer or sign over her Guardian authority to an alternative structure built around artificial intelligence, stating that no covenant exists that would permit an AI-based system to hold that role. Whatever one makes of the underlying claim, the shape of the decision is consistent: authority treated as a trust to be exercised on behalf of something larger, not a possession to be transferred, delegated, or automated away when a more convenient option is offered.
A Word She Uses Often
One phrase recurs often enough in her own public communications to be worth naming on its own: she has described FEAR as an acronym for “False Evidence Appearing Real.” It’s a small detail, almost a throwaway line, but it fits the larger pattern this series keeps finding in the service-to-others tradition — a consistent instinct to name the mechanism of control rather than simply warn against its effects. Fear, in this framing, isn’t an emotion to be managed. It’s a category of evidence to be examined and, where appropriate, discounted.
I find it ironic that our programming revolves so much around fear. The irony is that we give it so much weight, when it often has no physical weight at all, and may only exist in our minds or the ether. In the years of study that I apply to this material, a goal of self-discovery or healing espoused by the alternative community makes the point to address your fears. To deal with them by confronting them head on. The common comparison is the experience of a nightmare – once you stop running in the nightmare and face the fear, it dissolves. This psychological understanding of fear-based triggers is well understood by our controllers who serve it ad nauseum via their control systems. Kim stands up to those challenges and has seemingly learned to master her emotions to face what would destroy otherwise unprepared people.
The Sisyphean Pattern
Where this series can speak from closest range is also where it has to be most careful about what it actually says. This publication’s own network has direct knowledge of repeated attempts to bridge the gap between Kim Goguen’s authority and the administrative and financial interests still operating under the old system — attempts at compromise that keep being made, in good faith, and that keep running into the same wall. The pattern is real. The specifics are not this series’ to publish.
PATTERN, NOT SPECIFICS — What can be said plainly: leaders like Netanyahu, Hegseth, and Trump — each, by this series’ own Article 1 framing, invested in pushing toward rather than away from confrontation — turn every one of these bridging attempts into a Sisyphean exercise. An agreement in principle gets reached; the boulder rolls back down before it reaches the top. That is the pattern worth reporting. The people, places, and specific channels through which this publication knows it are not, for reasons of source security that apply as much to this publication as to anyone else in this series.
Kim’s own reporting corroborates the shape of this pattern independently, across a documented run of months rather than a single incident. From roughly September through November of 2025, her communications describe frequent, relatively open negotiation with generals, financial leaders, and government contacts. Through the following winter, into February of 2026, that tone shifts toward visible frustration as commitments made in those negotiations go unmet. By March and April, the language turns to final warnings, with the room for further negotiation described as visibly shrinking. By May and June, the register shifts again, from negotiation to enforcement — systems being dismantled, decisions described as already made rather than still open.
The recurring phrase inside that whole arc is a request for “one more chance”: more time, a promise of future cooperation, an assurance that a specific person or faction will be removed. A dated report from November 12, 2025 offers her own explanation for why this keeps happening rather than resolving: she attributes it directly to Marduk’s own manipulation style, described in the previous article, of telling each faction whatever it most wanted to hear. On this account, the leaders she keeps negotiating with aren’t necessarily acting in bad faith each time — many of them may be acting on the last thing they were told, by someone who told everyone something different, and calling it a plan.
The Case Against Her
This series has been explicit from its opening pages that Kim Goguen’s account is not offered as settled fact, and the strongest reason to hold that line is that a real, public, adversarial literature exists disputing her legitimacy entirely. Anna Von Reitz has published a direct public dispute of her standing. At least one source in wider circulation goes further, characterizing her not as Marduk’s successor at all but as a reprogrammed continuation of the same system under a new face — a “Marduk A.I. replacement,” in that framing, rather than the person who replaced him.
This series isn’t going to adjudicate that dispute, for the same reason it hasn’t adjudicated any other contested claim across eight prior articles: the litmus test isn’t resolved by settling whether contact happened, or whether a succession is legitimate in some final, provable sense. It’s resolved by what gets built. We do not know the realities of what drives many of our current, high-level politicians and ruling class. If we want to be authentic, we would just as readily rip into any of their stories. That Kim has baggage and a questionable story isn’t different than any of them. There will be arguments about any of this Contact Counter Current’s most prominent figures, and that is a healthier tradition than one that would present her account as beyond question — and it’s the same discernment this series has asked of every reader from Article 1 forward, applied here to the figure closest to the present moment rather than safely confined to history.
Scene from Kim’s latest release.
What the Test Actually Shows
Set against everything this series has established as the actual measure — not whether contact happened, but what was built from it — Kim Goguen’s account describes someone who inherited a system built for concealment and control and has spent the years since trying, with visibly limited success against real resistance, to redirect it toward disclosure and restoration instead. The bridge attempts stall. The promises break. The old administrative playbook keeps producing new faces to replace the ones removed. None of that is a clean success story, and this series isn’t presenting it as one. What it is, on the evidence gathered here, is a working example of the litmus test actually being applied, in real time, by someone with more to lose from applying it than almost anyone else this series has profiled.
The next article turns from a single figure to the wider network around her and every other voice this series has gathered — the people, some named outright and some protected by necessity, who make up the human side of this entire tradition.
EIDTOR’S NOTE — In a note received August 26, 2026, Sunny Gault — longtime anchor of United Network's news programming and daily working partner to Kim Goguen — announced her departure from United Network Productions, alleging that the Kim she worked alongside for years has been effectively replaced by an artificial system operating in her place. Gault points to “combative” messages, and Goguen increasingly using AI saying, “Everything she touched became artificial,” going as far as describing what she encountered in recent weeks as "an artificial shell of a person" rather than her friend. The change follows the departure of Mike, Kim's longtime roommate and United Network News producer, and coincides with a reported relocation from Durango, Colorado to the North East, either Connecticut or Vermont, said to be for proximity to her aging father. Gault's account is given firsthand, as testimony from someone who knew Kim intimately — not as a confirmed fact about what has actually happened. I will work on a piece over the weekend to address the information. As always, in the fog of war, it’s important to breathe and find some grounding before reacting. Then again, we are at war and there are casualties. A loss of a leader would be a terrible thing. To have that leader replaced serves some purpose as we’ve explored with other leaders in this fight, both positive and negative. If we apply the litmus test, we’ll learn soon enough what this really means and affects. Perhaps it’s another signal of a resolution? For sure, I believe, this indicates the stakes we’re fighting for and that they are real.
Like
0
Dislike
0
Love
0
Funny
0
Angry
0
Sad
0
Wow
0
